Security review for 1.0.0
The 1.0.0 release follows multiple AI-assisted security scans, review of the findings and end-to-end verification of fixes. This record describes completed SDK and release remediation; it does not claim every repository finding is closed or that an independent third-party audit was performed.
Completed remediation
| Fix | Merged PR |
|---|---|
| Payment authorization and exact-payment retries | #28 |
| Atomic, bounded durable state | #29 |
| Bounded network I/O and transport authority | #30 |
| Chain evidence and grant admission | #31 |
| Authenticated compiler inputs and covenant reproduction | #32 |
| Bounded hash-chain issuer storage with recovery capacity | #33 |
| Release archives bound to reviewed source and compiler evidence | #34 |
| Explicit mainnet configuration and network binding | #35 |
Each linked PR records its change and verification. Original scan findings remain historical evidence; fixes are documented through remediation records rather than rewriting the original scans. Supporting/demo findings are not all SDK release blockers and are not represented here as all resolved.
Release evidence
The release source is e5f5b0ed34657dc4e8c67c9153818e0ba07b1828, merged in
#37. Its
main CI passed
protocol/host verification, Windows checks, independent covenant reproduction
and SDK artifact preparation. The compiler is rebuilt from authenticated pinned
source; consensus validation uses pinned Rusty-Kaspa source.
The four final public SDK archives passed 55 external scenario groups and funded Testnet-10 qualification: 18 exact/batch flows and five hash-chain stages. The main CI archives match those qualified bytes exactly. See the release record and qualification harness.
The compatible demo also passed a funded payment and same-transaction retry through the public HTTPS website and deployed Worker, Durable Object and bounded transport relay. Its deployment proof is separate from the earlier local browser qualification.
Limits
AI-assisted review and passing tests do not guarantee the absence of defects. Funded evidence uses one configured Testnet authority. Stress and failure tests use controlled acceptance facts; they do not establish live mainnet throughput, independent-source agreement or production availability. Operators must meet the production operating requirements for their deployment.
Source: /docs/security-review-1.0.0.md